The future of mental health social work
The Think Ahead report published by IPPR in May has prompted much discussion among social work educators and practitioners. It has re-ignited the debate about fast-track programmes in the wake of Frontline and the appropriateness of training social workers in a little over a year. This debate will no doubt rumble on.
After attending the launch of the Think Ahead report I felt that the solution of a fast-track programme was retro-fitting the problem. Actually, I wasn’t entirely convinced that mental health social work was the problem. I blogged at the time that mental health remains a popular career option for social work students and the supply of graduates often outstrips mental health social work vacancies. My view is that the problem lies in community mental health services which do not always allow mental health social workers to practice social work.
It was clear at the time that Norman Lamb wanted a fast-track programme for Russell Group graduates to enter mental health social work and funding was made available from the Department of Health. I argued that it was important for us to engage with this to ensure mental health social workers play a role in shaping our future. That is what I have done.
I responded to a call for social work educators to become involved in developing the Think Ahead curriculum. This requires having a vision for the future of mental health social work. Of course, there is no guarantee that Think Ahead will deliver this vision, but it’s important to have a road map to guide it.
I wrote a discussion paper which outlined where I thought mental health social work needs to go in the future. The argument I offered was that through organisational transformation in community mental health services and the social work profession over the last 40 years, we have diminished our therapeutic potential. This needs to be rekindled through a focus on social interventions within an ecological framework of a person within their social environment.
I characterised this as intervening at the micro (with the individual), meso (with the individual and their family or people close to them) and macro (with the individual and their wider community) levels. Although a rather crude over-simplification, it illustrated how mental health social work needs to engage systemically with a person’s immediate and wider social networks to effectively support an individual’s recovery. Interventions must be evidence-informed to ensure that mental health social work practice can be as effective as possible. This is a radical vision as it will require community mental health services to change to permit it to happen.
I talked to social work practitioners, managers, leaders, educators and students about this vision. I am very grateful to all those who took the time to read the discussion document and provided me with their feedback. There was considerable agreement with my argument, which I have now presented to the Think Ahead team. I hope that the Think Ahead programme will have a positive impact on mental health social work in the years to come.